A car accident attorney in Las Vegas gave us a comprehensive view of the concept and meaning of the term Comparative Negligence. This article expresses his professional knowledge in a simple way to understand it. Car accidents are common occurrences on our roads, and they can result in severe injuries, property damage, and even death. If you have been involved in a car accident caused by another person's negligence, you may be entitled to compensation for your damages. However, what happens when you and the other driver are at fault for the accident? This is where the concept of comparative negligence comes into play.
Comparative negligence is a legal concept used to determine the degree of fault for each party involved in an accident. In a car accident claim, comparative negligence comes into play when the plaintiff and the defendant are found to have contributed to the accident. In this scenario, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of their fault.
Knowing the basics of negligence in a car accident claim is essential to understand comparative negligence. Negligence is the failure to exercise reasonable care that harms others. In a car accident claim, the plaintiff must prove the following four elements of negligence:
- Duty: The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care while driving.
- Breach: The defendant breached their duty of care by failing to drive reasonably safely.
- Causation: The defendant's breach of duty caused the plaintiff's injuries or damages.
- Damages: The plaintiff suffered actual damages as a result of the accident.
When both parties are found to have contributed to the accident, the court will use the concept of comparative negligence to apportion the fault between the plaintiff and the defendant. The court will look at the evidence presented and assign a percentage of fault to each party. For example, if the plaintiff were found to be 30% at fault for the accident, their damages would be reduced by 30%.
There are two types of comparative negligence: pure comparative negligence and modified comparative negligence. Let's take a closer look at each type.
Pure Comparative Negligence
In states that use pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by their percentage of fault, regardless of how much fault the defendant bears. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 50% at fault for the accident, their damages will be reduced by 50%, even if the defendant is found to be 50% at fault. Pure comparative negligence is used in California, Florida, and New York.
Pure comparative negligence differs from other comparative negligence in that the plaintiff's liability is lowered by their share of fault, regardless of how much fault the defendant carries. In contrast, different types of comparative negligence may set a threshold for the plaintiff's percentage of the defect before damages are reduced or may bar the plaintiff from recovering any damages if their percentage of fault is too high.
A court or jury determines fault by reviewing the evidence and assigning a percentage of fault to each party involved in the accident.
If you are in a car accident in a state that uses pure comparative negligence, you should gather as much evidence as possible to support your claim. Witness statements, police reports, and medical records may be included. You should also speak with an experienced car accident lawyer who can help you understand your state's laws and fight for the compensation you deserve.
Modified Comparative Negligence
In states that use modified comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages are reduced if their percentage of the fault falls below a threshold of 50% or 51%. If the plaintiff is found to be more than 50% or 51%, they are barred from recovering damages. Modified comparative negligence is used in Texas, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.
It is important to note that not all states use comparative negligence. Some states use contributory negligence, which bars the plaintiff from recovering any damages if they are found to have contributed to the accident in any way. Contributory negligence is used in Virginia, Maryland, and Alabama.
The concept of comparative negligence can be complex, and it is important to consult with an experienced car accident attorney if you are involved in an accident. Your attorney can help you understand the laws in your state and how they apply to your case.
In a comparative negligence case, gathering as much evidence as possible to prove your case is crucial. This evidence may include witness statements, police reports, medical records, and any other documentation related to the accident. Your attorney can help you gather and present this evidence in court to support your claim.
If you are found to be partially at fault for the accident, it is important, to be honest about your role in the accident. Trying to hide or minimize your role can harm your case and make it more difficult to recover damages. Instead, be upfront about your actions and work with your attorney to present a strong case.
Another important consideration in a comparative negligence case is the role of insurance. In some states, insurance companies must follow relative negligence laws and pay damages based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party. However, in some states, insurance companies may try to minimize their payout by arguing the plaintiff was partially at fault for the accident. This is why an experienced attorney can negotiate with the insurance company and fight for your deserved compensation.
In conclusion, comparative negligence is an essential concept in car accident claims. When both parties are found to have contributed to the accident, the court will use comparative negligence to determine the degree of fault for each party and reduce the plaintiff's damages accordingly. It is essential to understand the laws in your state and work with an experienced attorney to gather evidence and present a strong case. Doing so can maximize your chances of recovering the compensation you need to cover your damages and move forward after a car accident.
Comments