Online Law Tutors in London, whether at undergraduate or postgraduate level, are not just about knowing the law—they're about how effectively you can analyze legal issues using structured reasoning. Success depends on your ability to identify relevant issues, apply the correct legal principles, and logically argue your conclusions. This guide outlines key techniques to help you analyze more effectively during law exams in London.
1. Understand the Exam Format
Most law exams in London (e.g., at UCL, King's College, Queen Mary, etc.) follow a predictable format: problem questions, essay questions, or both. Problem questions require application of law to facts, while essay questions require critical analysis of legal arguments or theories. Your approach to each must differ.
Problem questions test your ability to:
- Spot legal issues from facts
- Apply law accurately
- Reach a reasoned conclusion
Essay questions test your ability to:
- Evaluate different viewpoints
- Use case law, academic commentary, and policy arguments
- Reach a persuasive analytical judgment
2. IRAC: Your Best Friend for Problem Questions
The IRAC structure is the foundation of strong legal analysis:
- Issue: Identify the legal issue or question raised by the facts.
- Rule: State the relevant legal rule (case law or statute).
- Application: Apply the rule to the specific facts—this is the analytical core.
- Conclusion: State your conclusion based on the application.
Example: If a scenario involves a customer slipping in a shop, don’t jump to saying the shop is liable. Instead, analyze using the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957, refer to Wheat v E Lacon, and apply the principles to the specific facts: Was there a duty? Was it breached? Was damage caused?
3. Start with Issue Spotting
The first step to solid analysis is recognizing what’s legally significant in the question. This involves:
- Carefully reading the facts
- Identifying who might sue whom and why
- Looking for legal triggers (e.g., contracts formed, trespass, negligence)
In London law schools, issue-spotting is often where marks are won or lost. You won't be credited for applying the correct law if you've misunderstood the issue.
4. Use Relevant Legal Authority
Analysis is only as good as the law behind it. You must:
- Cite case law accurately (e.g., Donoghue v Stevenson for negligence)
- Reference statutory law (e.g., the Theft Act 1968 for criminal law)
- Understand key principles and any exceptions
However, don’t just drop names of cases. Use them to support arguments. For example, in a contract law problem, don't just write Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co—explain how the offer, acceptance, and intention in that case apply to the facts in your scenario.
5. Apply Law Critically to Facts
This is the heart of analysis. Many students merely state rules and facts separately without linking them. You must:
- Weave facts into the legal discussion
- Consider multiple interpretations
- Identify uncertainties or ambiguities
For instance: “Given that the defendant placed the warning sign after the spill occurred, it may be argued that reasonable steps were not taken to prevent harm, as seen in Ward v Tesco Stores Ltd.”
This shows you're not just regurgitating the law—you’re reasoning with it.
6. Balance and Counterarguments
Strong legal analysis often includes:
- Acknowledging opposing views
- Weighing evidence and principles
- Offering a balanced, reasoned conclusion
In criminal law, for example, you might assess whether a defendant acted under duress but then question whether the threat was immediate enough to meet the test in R v Hasan.
This kind of evaluation shows critical thinking—a key criterion in London law schools.
7. Structure Matters
Presentation influences clarity. Use headings and subheadings (if permitted), especially for problem questions:
- Issue 1: Duty of Care
- Issue 2: Breach of Duty
- Issue 3: Causation
Paragraphs should begin with a point, followed by authority, then detailed application. Clarity boosts your marks, especially when time-pressured markers are reading your answer.
8. Time Management and Prioritization
Many law students in London fall into the trap of over-analyzing one issue and running out of time for others. Allocate your time wisely. For example:
- 10 minutes to plan
- Equal time per question
- Reserve 5–10 minutes at the end for review
Stick to one issue per paragraph to help the examiner follow your argument. If you’re unsure on an area, state your assumptions and move on.
9. Answer the Question Asked
A top law school answer in London is always relevant. Don't write a pre-learned answer hoping it fits. Tailor your response to the specific facts or essay theme.
A good tip: rephrase the question in your own words before you start writing. This helps stay on track.
10. Practice Makes Perfect
Finally, analytical skills are developed through practice, not just reading. Review model answers, attempt past papers, and ask for feedback. Join study groups or workshops—many London universities offer mock exams and answer clinics.
Conclusion
Analyzing effectively on a law school exam in London involves a disciplined, methodical approach: identify the legal issues, apply relevant laws critically, use structured reasoning, and manage your time well. The ability to analyze, rather than just recite, is what distinguishes high-performing law students. With consistent practice and the right mindset, you can master legal analysis and excel in your exams.
Comments